Re: "Why building more homes near transit will transform lives across California"
As a former city council member, much of the commentary surrounding Senate Bill 79 can be exasperating. SB 79 seems to be based on little more than drawing circles around transit stops. This is not planning.
The Legislature already requires local jurisdictions to plan and zone for far more housing through the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, or RHNA (pronounced ree-nah). Along with state reviewers, California's 540 local jurisdictions have spent countless dollars on RHNA over the years.
SB 79 throws a wrench into the process.
The goal of upzoning should be to shape development so that taller apartments are built along
transit corridors. This increase in density creates more foot traffic on the street, allowing shops and restaurants to thrive. It also increases the number of commuters who can easily be served by transit.
Too much upzoning, like that proposed by SB 79, will allow developers to spread out buildings over a wide area, randomly dotting the landscape with expensive apartment towers. This does nothing to bring about the benefits of urban density.